Your tax dollars at work
Feb. 10th, 2005 11:07 amVirginia Lawmakers prove to the rest of the world that they are STUPID
Showing undies could cost Virginians $50.
Bill sets fine for low-riding pants
Wednesday, February 9, 2005 Posted: 10:04 AM EST (1504 GMT)
RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Virginians who wear their pants so low their underwear shows may want to think about investing in a stronger belt.
The state's House of Delegates passed a bill Tuesday authorizing a $50 fine for anyone who displays his or her underpants in a "lewd or indecent manner."
Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., a Democrat who opposed the bill, had pleaded with his colleagues to remember their own youthful fashion follies.
During an extended monologue Monday, he talked about how they dressed or wore their hair in their teens. On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement.
"This is a foolish bill, Mr. Speaker, because it will hurt so many," Spruill said before the measure was approved 60-34. It now goes to the state Senate.
The bill's sponsor, Del. Algie T. Howell, has said constituents were offended by the exposed underwear. He did not speak on the floor Tuesday.
Spruill and Howell, also a Democrat, are both black.
Ok, so they are offended.. don't friggin' LOOK! I might not enjoy seen the color or brand of someone underdrawers, but fining them is truly moronic. As for the reporter commenting on the ethnicity of the ones for this stupid bill: Who gives a shit?
Showing undies could cost Virginians $50.
Bill sets fine for low-riding pants
Wednesday, February 9, 2005 Posted: 10:04 AM EST (1504 GMT)
RICHMOND, Virginia (AP) -- Virginians who wear their pants so low their underwear shows may want to think about investing in a stronger belt.
The state's House of Delegates passed a bill Tuesday authorizing a $50 fine for anyone who displays his or her underpants in a "lewd or indecent manner."
Del. Lionell Spruill Sr., a Democrat who opposed the bill, had pleaded with his colleagues to remember their own youthful fashion follies.
During an extended monologue Monday, he talked about how they dressed or wore their hair in their teens. On Tuesday, he said the measure was an unconstitutional attack on young blacks that would force parents to take off work to accompany their children to court just for making a fashion statement.
"This is a foolish bill, Mr. Speaker, because it will hurt so many," Spruill said before the measure was approved 60-34. It now goes to the state Senate.
The bill's sponsor, Del. Algie T. Howell, has said constituents were offended by the exposed underwear. He did not speak on the floor Tuesday.
Spruill and Howell, also a Democrat, are both black.
Ok, so they are offended.. don't friggin' LOOK! I might not enjoy seen the color or brand of someone underdrawers, but fining them is truly moronic. As for the reporter commenting on the ethnicity of the ones for this stupid bill: Who gives a shit?
no subject
Date: 2005-02-10 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-02-10 08:34 am (UTC)I'm just wondering, will they apply the same penalty (language aside: *guffaw!*) if the offender is an older man, displaying what's known around these parts as "builder's bum"?
Crazy(I won't be holding my breath. Growing up has meant, in part, realizing that justice is becoming ever less equal....)Soph
no subject
Date: 2005-02-10 09:54 am (UTC)I dont' know if the local frige repair man will get fined, as he just shows ass crack, not his undies. *shudder* (casting my vote for overalls to be worn by tradesmen)