Hello Americans, WAKE THE F&CK UP.
Jan. 19th, 2005 08:26 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
First it was Iraq and imaginary WMD... Remember those? The no-evidence-they-ever-existed-but-lets-invade-anyhow WMD?
Can you stomach a Second Serving of Bushshit?
This Man is a swaggering warmonger
How high does the body count have to go before you say ENOUGH! How many flag draped coffins will it take to make you shake off this stupid fog that the blue staters never entered? How many Americans have to be assaulted due to this 'man' waging war on everyone he convinces the masses is his 'enemy' (or enemy of the US.)
STOP HIM BEFORE HE IGNITES A F*&KING WORLD WAR!!!
EDIT: Read the language in the article. Same rhetoric that was used with Iraq and about their supposed (yet strongly denied) stockpiled WMD. They weren't lying when they said they had NONE! Iran is saying same thing. How the hell are they supposed to show records of shit that just doesn't f**king exist!
Politics - Reuters
Reuters
Bush Won't Rule Out Action Against Iran Over Nukes
Mon Jan 17, 8:55 PM ET
Add to My Yahoo! Politics - Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) said on Monday he would not rule out military action against Iran if that country was not more forthcoming about its suspected nuclear weapons program.
"I hope we can solve it diplomatically, but I will never take any option off the table," Bush said in an interview with NBC News when asked if he would rule out the potential for military action against Iran "if it continues to stonewall the international community about the existence of its nuclear weapons program."
Iran denies it has been trying to make nuclear weapons and says its nuclear program is geared solely to producing electricity.
Bush's comments followed Pentagon (news - web sites) criticism on Monday of a published report that it was mounting reconnaissance missions inside Iran to identify potential nuclear and other targets.
"The Iranian regime's apparent nuclear ambitions and its demonstrated support for terrorist organizations is a global challenge that deserves much more serious treatment than Seymour Hersh provides in the New Yorker article titled "The Coming Wars," the Pentagon's chief spokesman, Lawrence DiRita, said in a statement.
Hersh's article, published on Sunday, was "so riddled with errors of fundamental fact that the credibility of his entire piece is destroyed," DiRita said.
Hersh reported Bush had signed a series of top-secret findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces military units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia.
DiRita did not comment on that assertion.
He said Hersh's sources fed him "rumor, innuendo, and assertions about meetings that never happened, programs that do not exist and statements by officials that were never made."
Asked whether U.S. military forces had been conducting reconnaissance missions in Iran, Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. Barry Venable said, "We don't discuss missions, capabilities or activities of Special Operations forces."
Can you stomach a Second Serving of Bushshit?
This Man is a swaggering warmonger
How high does the body count have to go before you say ENOUGH! How many flag draped coffins will it take to make you shake off this stupid fog that the blue staters never entered? How many Americans have to be assaulted due to this 'man' waging war on everyone he convinces the masses is his 'enemy' (or enemy of the US.)
STOP HIM BEFORE HE IGNITES A F*&KING WORLD WAR!!!
EDIT: Read the language in the article. Same rhetoric that was used with Iraq and about their supposed (yet strongly denied) stockpiled WMD. They weren't lying when they said they had NONE! Iran is saying same thing. How the hell are they supposed to show records of shit that just doesn't f**king exist!
Politics - Reuters
Reuters
Bush Won't Rule Out Action Against Iran Over Nukes
Mon Jan 17, 8:55 PM ET
Add to My Yahoo! Politics - Reuters
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Bush (news - web sites) said on Monday he would not rule out military action against Iran if that country was not more forthcoming about its suspected nuclear weapons program.
"I hope we can solve it diplomatically, but I will never take any option off the table," Bush said in an interview with NBC News when asked if he would rule out the potential for military action against Iran "if it continues to stonewall the international community about the existence of its nuclear weapons program."
Iran denies it has been trying to make nuclear weapons and says its nuclear program is geared solely to producing electricity.
Bush's comments followed Pentagon (news - web sites) criticism on Monday of a published report that it was mounting reconnaissance missions inside Iran to identify potential nuclear and other targets.
"The Iranian regime's apparent nuclear ambitions and its demonstrated support for terrorist organizations is a global challenge that deserves much more serious treatment than Seymour Hersh provides in the New Yorker article titled "The Coming Wars," the Pentagon's chief spokesman, Lawrence DiRita, said in a statement.
Hersh's article, published on Sunday, was "so riddled with errors of fundamental fact that the credibility of his entire piece is destroyed," DiRita said.
Hersh reported Bush had signed a series of top-secret findings and executive orders authorizing secret commando groups and other Special Forces military units to conduct covert operations against suspected terrorist targets in as many as 10 nations in the Middle East and South Asia.
DiRita did not comment on that assertion.
He said Hersh's sources fed him "rumor, innuendo, and assertions about meetings that never happened, programs that do not exist and statements by officials that were never made."
Asked whether U.S. military forces had been conducting reconnaissance missions in Iran, Defense Department spokesman Lt. Col. Barry Venable said, "We don't discuss missions, capabilities or activities of Special Operations forces."
no subject
Date: 2005-01-19 01:55 am (UTC)*< end rampant irony / > *
no subject
Date: 2005-01-19 07:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-19 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-01-19 03:34 pm (UTC)refer back to this wonderful quote:
http://www.livejournal.com/users/anysia/239268.html
no subject
Date: 2005-01-19 01:25 pm (UTC)